JOHANNESBURG, SOUTH AFRICA — The Western Cape High Court’s decision to suspend the parliamentary impeachment proceedings against President Cyril Ramaphosa has ignited a wave of criticism from opposition parties.
The ruling, which halts the Section 89 impeachment committee’s public hearings, stems from Ramaphosa’s application to review the legality of the independent panel report into the Phala Phala matter.
The court’s 2-1 decision to grant Ramaphosa an interim interdict pending his review application has been met with anger, with critics decrying the move as an attempt to delay the inevitable. Vuyolwethu Zungula, President of the African Transformation Movement, expressed concern over the ruling’s impact on the country’s democratic institutions, stating that the president’s actions are “postponing the inevitable. “.
The opposition views the ruling as a delaying tactic, while the ANC supports the president’s legal rights.
As the nation awaits the outcome of Ramaphosa’s review application, scheduled from 2 to 4 September 2026, the political stakes remain high, with the Phala Phala saga continuing to dominate the country’s political landscape.
*Additional reporting by ImNews | Sources consulted: 5*
—
This original article was produced by the ImNews editorial team
Source: Africanews
Source: Rédaction Africanews
