Godongwana’s U-turn on Municipal Grants: Relief for 69 Cities Amidst Skepticism DATELINE: Johannesburg, South Africa – 2026-07-28 LEAD South Africa’s Finance Minister, Enoch Godongwana, has reversed the National Treasury’s decision to withhold municipal grants for 69 municipalities, a move that has sparked both relief and skepticism.
The Treasury had invoked Section 216 of the Municipal Finance Management Act to withhold the equitable share transfers, citing financial mismanagement and non-compliance with the Act.
The National Treasury had temporarily withheld July 2026 equitable share transfers to 69 municipalities across all nine provinces, totaling R7.
1 billion. This move aimed to enforce fiscal discipline and ensure accountability among municipal officials.
The affected municipalities included major metros like Johannesburg, Buffalo City, Nelson Mandela Bay, and Mangaung.
However, Godongwana announced the release of the withheld funds, stating that the Treasury would release the funds to ensure continued service delivery in the affected municipalities. This decision has been described as a U-turn by some, as it contrasts with the Treasury’s initial stance of withholding the funds due to concerns about financial management in the affected municipalities. Some commenters have expressed skepticism about the Treasury’s liquidity to support such an outflow without a corresponding inflow, suggesting it may be a political move.
They question whether the Treasury has the resources to support this outflow without a corresponding inflow, implying that it might be a political move.
The municipal equitable share is a portion of the national government’s budget allocated to local governments to support service delivery. Withholding such funds can significantly impact the ability of municipalities to provide essential services to their residents, including water, sanitation, and education.
The move by the National Treasury to release the funds is seen as a U — turn, as it had previously withheld the funds due to concerns about financial management in the affected municipalities. Some have suggested that the release of the funds may be a way to address the immediate service delivery crisis without addressing the underlying financial management issues.
The credibility of the story is slightly reduced due to the lack of specific details on the financial situation of the municipalities and the potential political motivations behind the U — turn.
The sources also do not provide information on the outcomes of the financial management concerns that led to the initial withholding of funds. KICKER: As the National Treasury moves to release the withheld funds, the long-term financial stability of the affected municipalities remains a concern.
The question of whether the release of funds is a temporary fix or a step towards sustainable financial management is expected to be closely watched by both the public and experts.
*Additional reporting by ImNews | Sources consulted: 5*
—
This original article was produced by the ImNews editorial team
Source: Google News v2
